@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix ns0: <http://erlangen-crm.org/current/> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix ns1: <http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix metadata: <http://data.bioontology.org/metadata/> .
@prefix metadata_def: <http://data.bioontology.org/metadata/def/> .
ns0:E10_Transfer_of_Custody
metadata_def:mappingLoom "e10transferofcustody" ;
metadata_def:mappingSameURI ns0:E10_Transfer_of_Custody ;
metadata_def:prefLabel "E10 Transfer of Custody"@de, "E10 Transfer of Custody"@el, "E10 Transfer of Custody"@en, "E10 Transfer of Custody"@fr, "E10 Transfer of Custody"@pt, "E10 Transfer of Custody"@ru, "E10 Transfer of Custody"@zh ;
metadata:prefixIRI "ecrm:E10_Transfer_of_Custody" ;
a owl:Class, owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:comment """Scope note:
This class comprises transfers of the physical custody or the legal responsibility for the physical custody of objects. The recording of the donor or recipient is optional. It is possible that in an instance of E10 Transfer of Custody there is either no donor or no recipient.
Depending on the circumstances, it may describe:
1. the beginning of custody (there is no previous custodian)
2. the end of custody (there is no subsequent custodian)
3. the transfer of custody (transfer from one custodian to the next)
4. the receipt of custody from an unknown source (the previous custodian is unknown)
5. the declared loss of an object (the current or subsequent custodian is unknown)
In the event that only a single kind of transfer of custody occurs, either the legal responsibility for the custody or the actual physical possession of the object but not both, this difference should be expressed using the property
P2 has type (is type of).
The sense of physical possession requires that the object of custody be in the hands of the keeper at least with a part representative for the whole. The way, in which a representative part is defined, should ensure that it is unambiguous who keeps a part and who the whole and should be consistent with the identity criteria of the kept instance of E18 Physical Thing.
The interpretation of the museum notion of \"accession\" differs between institutions. The CIDOC CRM therefore models legal ownership and physical custody separately. Institutions will then model their specific notions of accession and deaccession as combinations of these.
Theft is a specific case of illegal transfer of custody.
Examples:
- the delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery
- the return of Picasso’s “Guernica” to Madrid’s Prado in 1981 (Chipp, 1988)
- the transfer of custody of the work described as “Von der Velden ein Ufer an der See” from Johann Matthäus von Merian to the Auction House Heldevier (Jacob) for the purpose of sale, ca. 1716
- the transfer of custody of the painting ‘Mrs. Fitzherbert’ to the art dealer Knoedler from Parke-Bernet Galleries (New York, NY, USA) ca. March 1941
In First Order Logic:
- E10(x) ⇒ E7(x)
"""@en ;
rdfs:label "E10 Transfer of Custody"@en, "E10 Transfert de la garde"@fr, "E10 Transferência de Custódia"@pt, "E10 Übertragung des Gewahrsams"@de, "E10 Μεταβίβαση Κατοχής"@el, "E10 Передача Опеки"@ru, "E10 转移监护权"@zh ;
rdfs:subClassOf ns0:E7_Activity ;
owl:sameAs ns1:E10_Transfer_of_Custody ;
skos:notation "E10"@en .
ns0:P28_custody_surrendered_by
rdfs:domain ns0:E10_Transfer_of_Custody .
ns0:P28i_surrendered_custody_through
rdfs:range ns0:E10_Transfer_of_Custody .
ns0:P29_custody_received_by
rdfs:domain ns0:E10_Transfer_of_Custody .
ns0:P29i_received_custody_through
rdfs:range ns0:E10_Transfer_of_Custody .
ns0:P30_transferred_custody_of
rdfs:domain ns0:E10_Transfer_of_Custody .
ns0:P30i_custody_transferred_through
rdfs:range ns0:E10_Transfer_of_Custody .
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix ns0: <http://erlangen-crm.org/current/> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix ns1: <http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix metadata: <http://data.bioontology.org/metadata/> .
@prefix metadata_def: <http://data.bioontology.org/metadata/def/> .
ns0:E10_Transfer_of_Custody
metadata_def:mappingLoom "e10transferofcustody" ;
metadata_def:mappingSameURI ns0:E10_Transfer_of_Custody ;
metadata_def:prefLabel "E10 Transfer of Custody"@de, "E10 Transfer of Custody"@el, "E10 Transfer of Custody"@en, "E10 Transfer of Custody"@fr, "E10 Transfer of Custody"@pt, "E10 Transfer of Custody"@ru, "E10 Transfer of Custody"@zh ;
metadata:prefixIRI "ecrm:E10_Transfer_of_Custody" ;
a owl:Class, owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:comment """Scope note:
This class comprises transfers of the physical custody or the legal responsibility for the physical custody of objects. The recording of the donor or recipient is optional. It is possible that in an instance of E10 Transfer of Custody there is either no donor or no recipient.
Depending on the circumstances, it may describe:
1. the beginning of custody (there is no previous custodian)
2. the end of custody (there is no subsequent custodian)
3. the transfer of custody (transfer from one custodian to the next)
4. the receipt of custody from an unknown source (the previous custodian is unknown)
5. the declared loss of an object (the current or subsequent custodian is unknown)
In the event that only a single kind of transfer of custody occurs, either the legal responsibility for the custody or the actual physical possession of the object but not both, this difference should be expressed using the property
P2 has type (is type of).
The sense of physical possession requires that the object of custody be in the hands of the keeper at least with a part representative for the whole. The way, in which a representative part is defined, should ensure that it is unambiguous who keeps a part and who the whole and should be consistent with the identity criteria of the kept instance of E18 Physical Thing.
The interpretation of the museum notion of \"accession\" differs between institutions. The CIDOC CRM therefore models legal ownership and physical custody separately. Institutions will then model their specific notions of accession and deaccession as combinations of these.
Theft is a specific case of illegal transfer of custody.
Examples:
- the delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery
- the return of Picasso’s “Guernica” to Madrid’s Prado in 1981 (Chipp, 1988)
- the transfer of custody of the work described as “Von der Velden ein Ufer an der See” from Johann Matthäus von Merian to the Auction House Heldevier (Jacob) for the purpose of sale, ca. 1716
- the transfer of custody of the painting ‘Mrs. Fitzherbert’ to the art dealer Knoedler from Parke-Bernet Galleries (New York, NY, USA) ca. March 1941
In First Order Logic:
- E10(x) ⇒ E7(x)
"""@en ;
rdfs:label "E10 Transfer of Custody"@en, "E10 Transfert de la garde"@fr, "E10 Transferência de Custódia"@pt, "E10 Übertragung des Gewahrsams"@de, "E10 Μεταβίβαση Κατοχής"@el, "E10 Передача Опеки"@ru, "E10 转移监护权"@zh ;
rdfs:subClassOf ns0:E7_Activity ;
owl:sameAs ns1:E10_Transfer_of_Custody ;
skos:notation "E10"@en .
ns0:P28_custody_surrendered_by
rdfs:domain ns0:E10_Transfer_of_Custody .
ns0:P28i_surrendered_custody_through
rdfs:range ns0:E10_Transfer_of_Custody .
ns0:P29_custody_received_by
rdfs:domain ns0:E10_Transfer_of_Custody .
ns0:P29i_received_custody_through
rdfs:range ns0:E10_Transfer_of_Custody .
ns0:P30_transferred_custody_of
rdfs:domain ns0:E10_Transfer_of_Custody .
ns0:P30i_custody_transferred_through
rdfs:range ns0:E10_Transfer_of_Custody .